faculty training program

faculty training program

5 Entries
page:
display entries by:
1

the program where i expect new research assistants who can apply to so many theology staff to find a new religion in a year or two.

2

with the change made today, the rate of undergraduate grade point average used in score calculation increased from 25% to 35%, while the rate of ales score decreased from 60% to 50%. no need to write long. academician candidates who graduated from relatively high quality schools were blocked. there was already an injustice between the candidates with a passing grade of 70 in the 100 system and those who passed with a 60 or bell curve, which was a haircut.

3

although it is true that research assistant cadres are filled without any scientific examination, the practices experienced in direct purchases as equivalent to this program are a thousand worse. before this program, we had very qualified academicians, but did it harm this situation?

4

it was an unfair program. how fair is the grade point average requirement? how fair is it to keep the average done in a good university the same as the average done in nameplate universities? the majority of students graduating from a university with a passing grade of 70 are equated with university graduates with a passing grade of 50. the passing grade of 70 is also reduced by 10 points compared to the bullshit conversion. is that fairness?

5

(bkz: could not grow)

Page: