whoever said this also said this: (see wrong error)
"the background is already behind, there is no background, idiot!" an example of an expression disorder that the people of my country like to use and give the setting to the user, which is described as..
galat-ı famous, who has the ability to make even the most intelligent and equipped person look stupid.
okay, maybe it's not a big deal, but those who use the definition of "background" persistently despite all these warnings, get confused with knotty oak wood. i hope i was able to explain the difference in nuance.
there are also those who say "background".
(see: returning it)
(see back background)
i think this misuse occurs because of the word background. i even shake it out of my ass; this term was coined by the creators of such great terms as "new trend", "concept topic", "ambiace in atmosphere". in order to be physically meaningful, the back of the two separate backgrounds must be expressed.